Err Kami all of us admins got the message from training, yes, but McLovin is proposing that we treat fag, or gay, etc... the way we would treat jew or n*****. And I do find his line of reasoning rather convincing.
"If we allow Gay and Fag and Queer to be used when not specifically referring to someone's sexuality then why don't we allow Jew and Cracker or whatever when not specifically referring to someone's religion or race?"
I think he pointed out an interesting point of hypocrisy.
Bookmarks